The business media are abuzz this morning with reports that the Justice Department is investigating antitrust complaints against IBM in the mainframe computer market.
The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a trade group of computer hardware and software makers, alleges IBM — which holds a dominating share of the mainframe market — has stifled competition by refusing to license its software to user unless they also buy an IBM mainframe computer. It has also yanked software licenses from users who are found to be running the software on competitor’s machines.
Mainframe computers are big, expensive ($1 million-plus), powerful and reliable machines that handle tasks requiring high security, blazing speed or a high number of transactions.
How does this affect ATM owners and users? Because as part of processing a transaction, ATMs usually contact bank computers to verify account balances and transfer funds — and those bank computers often are mainframes.
If IBM is found to have violated antitrust law, it would probably mean more competition in the mainframe hardware and software markets. That would mean lower prices, which means a lower cost for building and operating a mainframe network. That potentially saves ATM operators money in two ways:
- By reducing the bank’s costs, it could reduce the fees that banks charge for access to their networks.
- That reduced cost might encourage more banks, credit unions or other players to build their own system, increasing choice and competition among banks and thereby reducing access fees.
A similar dynamic might play out in the credit-card market, with lower costs leading to lower fees for merchants and lower prices for customers.
Don’t expect immediate changes. The government might decide that IBM didn’t violate antitrust law, and even if they decide to pursue a case, it will likely take years to resolve. But it’s an example of how a seemingly arcane and remote event can reach down and affect people like us.















